This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at frontier dot com>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:10:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
References: <4D43495C.5060207@frontier.com> <20110129151058.GA16490@bromo.med.uc.edu>

On 01/29/2011 07:10 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
---- snip ----


Jerry,
    This patch causes the regressions...

FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_7.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/nan_7.f90  -O0  compilation failed to produce executable

I did not intend to include that test case yet. It is part of the libquadmath patch that I have not committed yet. I have Jakubs comments incorporated, but the test configure requires some magic yet. This is PR47293. The rest of PR47434 I will commit.

Sorry for the noise there.

Jerry

References:
- [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]