This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Update to WWW Docs for Contributing Doc Patches [wwwdocs]
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: Tom Browder <tom dot browder at gmail dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:06:22 +0100
- Subject: Re: Update to WWW Docs for Contributing Doc Patches [wwwdocs]
- References: <AANLkTin7JFdpbXKqcL_YvMABF1cr+b1Vt4meA1pL5Eks@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1009241941470.5068@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009242232270.20000@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20100926060334.GJ17516@gmx.de> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1009290440150.5068@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20100929044140.GA23710@gmx.de> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101281900460.7158@gerinyyl.fvgr>
* Gerald Pfeifer wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 07:12:06PM CET:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >> So, should we hold off Tom's documentation patch for now?
> > IMHO you shouldn't. The text can still be simplified when the
> > requirement for a previous bootstrap is not needed any more for the
> > build environment to get set up on any of the active branches.
>
> Okay, so I went ahead and committed my proposed patch which is
> based on Tom's suggestion; included below again for reference.
FWIW, I don't see the patch, but this was about
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02256.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796
which has long been fixed since.
Cheers,
Ralf