This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [google] Sort output of find for libtool to ensure deterministic archives


Hello,

* Ollie Wild wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:22:48PM CET:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
> > On 01/27/2011 05:55 PM, Ollie Wild wrote:
> >> Perhaps it's time to do a wholesale import of latest libtool to GCC.
> >> Last I heard (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-11/msg00031.html),
> >> there were some problems with --with-sysroot.
> >
> > They can be worked around by disabling Libtool's --with-sysroot support.
> 
> What are the implications of that?  No configuring GCC with --with-sysroot?

No.  It turns off the new-in-Libtool-2.4 support for a --with-sysroot
flag that is not quite compatible with GCC's understanding of same flag.

I offered a wholesale update of Libtool in GCC a little while ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00580.html
It was not met with enthusiasm (understandably, given the timing).

Testing such an update (including src, and smoke testing Libtool's
testsuite on 20 or so operating systems) usually takes the better part
of a weekend, which is something I cannot in earnest promise for the
next few weekends; I might be able to exchange some testing for a better
flame suite.  So *please*, if the RM's reconsider, consider deciding
before Saturday.  And yes, there were no Libtool testsuite regressions a
couple of weeks ago, but I need to redo the patches anyway for the
recent FreeBSD 1.x removal patch.

Thanks,
Ralf


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]