This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFC, v3] New -fcompare-elim pass

On 01/18/2011 12:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Besides this, "seems to be perfect".

Heh.  Anyway, here's v3, with comments from v2 addressed.

I realize that neither mn10300 nor rx are even secondary targets.
However, this patch avoids a regression for these targets, and 
Nick did post a patch trying to address this (which I rejected)
at least as early as October.

Therefore I'm requesting that the Release Manager consider allowing
this pass at this late stage.


r~

Attachment: commit-cmp-elim
Description: Text document

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]