This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch c++]: Add special code for linker-plugin and libstdc++

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:45:22 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch c++]: Add special code for linker-plugin and libstdc++
References: <AANLkTiknGYnQ5UR+QHTx-vVCCbEZXH4+FkZA7ZiZe0tP@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=i+gx5ZG4PjLx-X8opF9LdSqL9PC0aVP_BHP8Y@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinHXT4+TC8BX_tbAE2LL=DfwijA=CF8vVHAnBQ7@mail.gmail.com>

Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> writes:

> I saw this discussion about avoiding rescan (and indeed it is
> reasonable), but as you already mentioned, it somehow stucked and no
> real decission was found.

Nobody has commented on that discussion other than H.J. and myself, and
we have diametrically opposed opinions.  I would prefer if somebody else
would consider the issue as well.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch c++]: Add special code for linker-plugin and libstdc++
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [patch c++]: Add special code for linker-plugin and libstdc++
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [patch c++]: Add special code for linker-plugin and libstdc++
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch c++]: Add special code for linker-plugin and libstdc++
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [patch c++]: Add special code for linker-plugin and libstdc++
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]