This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Volatile bitfields vs. inline asm memory constraints (attn: middle-end reviewers)
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:40:31 +0000
Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:06:00 +0000
> Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/01/2011 21:17, Julian Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:43:19 -0500
> > > DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I hope you're not waiting for *my* approval, it's not part of the
> > >> code I can do that for...
> > >
> > > I guess I'm waiting for a global reviewer, since I suppose expr.c
> > > doesn't fall under any of the other umbrella maintainership areas
> > > (except perhaps "RTL optimizers"?
> >
> > I would have thought "middle-end".
>
> OK, thanks. I assume the correct etiquette is *not* to CC the
> whole list of middle-end reviewers in these cases... I guess at least
> one of them will be reading the list anyway. Subject tweaked :-).
Well that didn't seem to work :-). Middle-end maintainers, could one of
you take a look at this patch please? Quick context: the bug this fixes
causes the QT library (and QT-dependent apps) to fail to build on ARM.
Also CC'ing Mark, who reviewed DJ Delorie's patch initially.
Thanks,
Julian