This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 08/28] mn10300: Define the A and D constraints.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/10/11 13:31, Richard Henderson wrote:
> From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> 
> This will allow combining am33 and mn103 alternatives
> without having to resort to the enabled attribute.
> 
> The existing 'A' constraint renamed to 'c'.  Thankfully
> this existing accumulator constraint doesn't appear in
> either newlib or eglibc sources.
Isn't this a user-visible change?  What about the kernel, didn't it have
an mn103 port and it'd be more likely to expose the old A constraint
than newlib/glibc IMHO.

At the least this probably ought to be documented.

jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNLG7VAAoJEBRtltQi2kC762AH/RLvvhQCLBQKegCr76T35eiE
RAYwAyQD5omvmcb+Q6p64CQfQOqNjj+6zv+KnPutNeoYTEwvrsHSw3j3xhLgiWI8
/OTZ8j7eulFyh7OqaMulpcUG2TNuATiyAkTg/kJ7j1vYTTue62IOCNds0gc70Jll
Bn/L14CrAhEd+vOJd0SPim3UQujxQl2np/UPtAhQ4Ou8QNlVxUf7IRjodJ2n/WiL
E2zjKL4sU8QSmWxIcVwiSlZnbK09ZjDwdVnRgD8ijeSwxHpEiG8R8nivZ9k7GazA
+cZba3dasPVR2a+M8jWl7vnp14HYCoA5eeQVLAvDNhozoW6QyPG+KEAvvlLQe68=
=Jqn0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]