This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs]: Updated gcc-4.6/changes.html for Objective-C/Objective-C++
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Nicola Pero <nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com>
- Cc: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, IainS <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>, gcc-patches at gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:43:58 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [wwwdocs]: Updated gcc-4.6/changes.html for Objective-C/Objective-C++
- References: <1289986290.375121733@192.168.2.229> <872C8B47-F6ED-4B65-A4EE-3B7511115102@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <1289988807.343722947@192.168.2.229> <92EE51E8-1B1F-4008-92F9-35CEA2A504DE@comcast.net> <1290016035.093525953@192.168.2.228> <8102F3C1-9935-4117-BDB9-589FB98EE75D@comcast.net> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1101081529380.4533@ybpnyubfg6.ybpnyqbznva6> <1294668299.19878664@192.168.4.58>
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Nicola Pero wrote:
> Ok to commit ? Any suggestions for changes ?
This is quite long compared to the length of your usual entries. It
is fine, just would be good to shorten it a bit.
Would it work to say
...will have support for <a href="gcc-4.6/changes.html#objective-c">many
new Objective-C features</a> and a new GNU Objective-C runtime API.
?
In the second sentence how about omitting "work" and "helpful", especially
the latter appears redundant. ;-) And I think "support" is sufficient,
we don't need "support and review" here.
Gerald