This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch i386,c,c++]: PR/12171 - calling convention omitted in error message

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:36:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch i386,c,c++]: PR/12171 - calling convention omitted in error message
References: <AANLkTi=WqqzyfhVYYhsz96jNjQqeALq+LjTordVs90Ew@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimRHU5u6oZ3n9-8LuierC8V-ECqGx+kENmRHvJY@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/22/2010 09:29 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

I'm opposed to printing all attributes -- the resulting sea of
irrelevant information, for most cases, is counterproductive.

How often do types have anything in TYPE_ATTRIBUTES, much less irrelevant attributes? I can't imagine such a change making any difference for most code, and it's likely to help for any code that it does affect.

(Adding Ian to the CC list since he apparently had an opinion)

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch i386,c,c++]: PR/12171 - calling convention omitted in error message
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- [patch i386,c,c++]: PR/12171 - calling convention omitted in error message
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch i386,c,c++]: PR/12171 - calling convention omitted in error message
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]