This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] fix c++/18016 - warn about self-initialization in constructor init-list

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:02:44 +0000
Subject: Re: [patch] fix c++/18016 - warn about self-initialization in constructor init-list
References: <AANLkTi=-iE3V_qDTyz7XuSX7wLHJPfa5VOKhYC8=Vm6_@mail.gmail.com> <4D10DE3A.2070706@oracle.com> <AANLkTi=XxKA5CewBxukivwXxVsXov-MTLWTNYFSU9cGd@mail.gmail.com>

On 21 December 2010 17:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21 December 2010 17:04, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> + ?if (warn_uninitialized && init && init != NULL_TREE
>>
>> I think the last check in this line is redundant.
>
> Thanks, Paolo. I should have checked the definition of NULL_TREE.
>
> I'm re-testing with that change, but it shouldn't affect the results.

Updated patch, tested x86_64-linux

Attachment: 18016-2.txt
Description: Text document

References:
- [patch] fix c++/18016 - warn about self-initialization in constructor init-list
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [patch] fix c++/18016 - warn about self-initialization in constructor init-list
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [patch] fix c++/18016 - warn about self-initialization in constructor init-list
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]