This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Bump LTO_major_version
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2010, Richard Guenther <email@example.com> wrote:
> > So I guess we really don't want _this_ strict testing ...
> How about, be conservative by default, but add an option that relaxes
> the LTO compatibility test?
I thought of basing the test on ENABLE_CHECKING setting ...?
(or we can add a magic --param).
Any idea about the Makefile dependency issue?
We could also simply generate a random number per compile and use
that ... (which would be even more strict)