This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Remove warning while compiling with CLooG isl


On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:01:07PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 09:27 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Tobi,
>>     Thanks for the clarification. The original patch...
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01193.html
>>
>> was a bit confusing on this issue. While the legacy cloog is defined
>> as CLooG-PPL, it isn't clearly stated that CLooG-Pharma actually creates
>> libcloog-ppl...
>
> FWIW it's Parma (as in  
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Prosciutto_di_Parma_-_affettato2.jpg  
> :P), and in the latest patches it's --enable-cloog-backend=ppl-legacy  
> vs. --enable-cloog-backend=ppl.
>
> Paolo

Paolo,
   I am puzzled by the objections expressed about 'switching the backends' in the
current configure changes. Is this objection due to the change from a PPL based
to a ISL based cloog or the switch from legacy cloog itself? As legacy cloog was always
intended to be replaced by an official CLooG.org release, it ssems like a natural
change. Certainly a switch to defaulting cloog to cloog-isl eliminates any issues
with the ppl ABI changes from 0.10.x to 0.11. The only problem would be the absence
of tarballs in gcc infrastructure for building cloog.org's cloog-isl.
          Jack


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]