This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
2010/11/11 Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta@gmail.com>:
>>>> Does that mean you are committing it, or you need someone to?
>>>>
> I don't have commit permissions. Maybe I should note this on first
> post, shouldn't I?
>
>>> I am just retesting it, and when successful I will commit it for you.
> Cool! Thank you!
>
>> PS: Using LTO easily busts the available memory of a 32-bit process on
>> Windows targets as I had to notice ;)
> I didn't notice, but I didn't try to compile any big program. Do you
> think that the limit in Windows is significantly lower than in Linux?
> I don't see any reason for this to be the case.
>
> Regards.
> Rodrigo
>
Committed at revision 166645.
Kai
--
|? (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
| (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
| (")_(") him gain world domination
- References:
- [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes
- Re: [PATCH] fix PR 46376, mix LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes