This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Revision 166517 caused PR 46414
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Jan Hubicka <email@example.com> wrote:
>> The complette unrilling seems sane here.
>> This seems like good idea to me and i am not quite sure why 32bit compilation does not do the
>> transofrm. I will check now.
> The reason is word size. ?We compute move costs based on this, so vectorized moves are more expensive
> in 32bit cost model than 64bit.
> Perhaps there is way to hook vectorizer cost model in here?
Shouldn't we use vector size to compute move cost for vector move?