This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, middle-end]: Fix PR 44569
On 11/02/2010 11:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Out of interest, is this canonical rtl? I wasn't sure whether it
> should be a const_vector instead.
We probably can end up with various non-canonical RTL in debug-insns
(like we can end up with non-gimple trees in debug statements). Sad
If the choice is between a CONST_VECTOR and a CONCATN, a precise
definition of the one that is incorrect (I don't know which) would be
"wrong RTL" rather than "non-canonical RTL". :)