This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PR debug/45673] fix more MEM_REF -fcompare-debug lossage

On Oct  2, 2010, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> MEM-REFs _explicitly_ are supposed to ignore the type of the first
> operand.

And indeed we do ignore it, except in dumps, in which we look at them to
decide whether to print an explicit conversion, and this is where
differences kick in.

> So, what is the testcase in question that your patch would fix?

The one in PR 45673.  Should we implement #c2?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]