This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Fix bootstrap on x86

From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:27:33 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix bootstrap on x86
References: <AANLkTi=hcUksWf4VtpedbS6heG5W1mdhqV3kCwGNU+7U@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinNyD-VjsoDjz+BBsMbuysRG-SSOnJswOsOigKz@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikJVz2d_LomOrkeeANnuge7xRBPSOXYRZXchRQC@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimBYTp7KL+ifOW1DS8pv1ixqvdvSf1O0Wa5v9RQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:16:17PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Here is a patch.  Bootstrapped on Linux/x86-64.  Compiled cc1 for
> ARM, PowerPC. MIPS and Sparc.  OK to install?

If this patch eliminates all instances of UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD, you
should also poison that identifier in system.h.

-Nathan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Fix bootstrap on x86
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: Fix bootstrap on x86
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Fix bootstrap on x86
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: PATCH: Fix bootstrap on x86
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Fix bootstrap on x86
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]