This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: ARM: Implement __builtin_trap


On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:

> On 9/9/2010 11:20 AM, David Daney wrote:
> 
>> I saw that, and I have no objections to that patch.  But I was thinking
>> that this essentially augments the ABI.  Could or should this be
>> coordinated with the maintainers of any ARM ABIs?
> 
> Do other psABIs document how __builtin_trap is implemented?
> 
> Richard E. is certainly in a position to comment on this.  The only
> issue I see is that we're "using up" an instruction in the undefined
> instruction space, meaning that it can't be used in some other magic way
> by an OS.  Linux presently uses an undefined instruction as a software
> breakpoint.  (I'm not sure why it does that instead of using an SVC
> instruction?)  But is there other stuff out there that might need this?

FWIW, the LLVM ARM backend compiles __builtin_trap into "trap" (aka .word 0xe7ffdefe).

-Chris


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]