This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [fortran] Set TREE_STATIC flag on static initializers

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rguenther at suse dot de, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:22:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [fortran] Set TREE_STATIC flag on static initializers
References: <20100904231844.GF31380@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

Jan Hubicka wrote:

fortran, unlike all other frontends, does not set TREE_STATIC flag on static
initializers.  This prevents us from folding till the cfgexpand time.  To be honest,
I am not quite sure why we insist on the flag (I guess we should assert that all statics
are initializerd with static initializer or ignore it), but this patch brings gfortran
into sync with others.

Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?

OK. Thanks for the patch.

Tobias

PS: It helps to CC fortran@ for Fortran patches; sending them only to gcc-patches@ reduces the chance of getting them reviewed.

References:
- [fortran] Set TREE_STATIC flag on static initializers
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]