This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Non-TFmode targets broken with "[fortran,patch] Complete front-end support for __float128"

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:49:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Non-TFmode targets broken with "[fortran,patch] Complete front-end support for __float128"
References: <201008280036.o7S0a3E2017670@ignucius.se.axis.com> <A7CC4D1E-65D3-4DA6-9D1C-CFE01789C6B9@gmail.com> <AANLkTin72ooLGkzp63XgsRa=wtd9NRBTKcbX9U_sGnYr@mail.gmail.com> <DCDD5DE6-1DD4-4D22-AA78-E7BF6CAE4570@gmail.com>

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:47 AM, FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com> wrote:
> For int128, the way I see it is that you use it (TImode) unconditionaly in gcc/tree.c

Yes because TImode is defined in machmode.def which is unlike TFmode
which is not included in all targets.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non-TFmode targets broken with "[fortran,patch] Complete front-end support for __float128"
  - From: FX

References:
- Non-TFmode targets broken with "[fortran,patch] Complete front-end support for __float128"
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: Non-TFmode targets broken with "[fortran,patch] Complete front-end support for __float128"
  - From: FX
- Re: Non-TFmode targets broken with "[fortran,patch] Complete front-end support for __float128"
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: Non-TFmode targets broken with "[fortran,patch] Complete front-end support for __float128"
  - From: FX

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]