This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>
To: Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:43:58 +0200
Subject: Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
References: <AANLkTinC63bTFYgF_Mnj4G_5baCby_FP0VittqadnVJq@mail.gmail.com> <4C69B201.4020704@redhat.com> <AANLkTimYRJ1sj+55CncoqCu4XfhZehJ8YdVQY=EmRov-@mail.gmail.com> <4C735EF1.1050008@redhat.com> <AANLkTimLaNDJOewBmp=V_hTYX6WnKERUBBgOZ3nsCewQ@mail.gmail.com> <4C77CCAB.5050502@oracle.com> <AANLkTima84W9Agk09qd=PmgROQR1FV8yMnY97W+M+rzv@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

> Actually, according to http://www.tfd.com/dependant it is correct,
> although since this word is not used in GCC it is better changed.

To be clear, is not used in the C++ Standards, as a term of art, just in case somebody thinks we are talking about a GCC quirk.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas

References:
- Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops
  - From: Rodrigo Rivas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]