This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rs6000] hookize FUNCTION_ARG &co.

From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:49:12 -0700
Subject: Re: [rs6000] hookize FUNCTION_ARG &co.
References: <20100824205013.GR25394@codesourcery.com> <AANLkTikX_aX8pvzZrRQ4nTSZZh0JjOJzEYoLfDjGzfRt@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:59:52PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > The patch below hookizes FUNCTION_ARG and related macros for the rs6000
> > backend. ?There's a bit of churn to make sure we don't get warnings from
> > passing const_trees around and using bools instead of ints, but nothing
> > major. ?I *think* the `depth' argument for rs6000_function_arg_advance_1
> > is bogus and can be removed, but that's a reasonable follow-up patch.
> > AFAICS, it's never called recursively.
> 
> Okay.
> 
> A sanity check on ppc64-linux would be nice.

Sanity-checked by bootstrapping on ppc64-linux.  Thanks.

-Nathan

References:
- [rs6000] hookize FUNCTION_ARG &co.
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: [rs6000] hookize FUNCTION_ARG &co.
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]