This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 45366: Problem with procedure pointer dummy in PURE function

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:02:27 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 45366: Problem with procedure pointer dummy in PURE function
References: <AANLkTimTsY3uSo3n_2X6e=1NtWzgU9qSJKVhaP1RcOfS@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/23/2010 11:46 AM, Janus Weil wrote

The patch was regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I think it's
pretty much obvious. Ok for trunk?

OK. Thanks for the patch!

2010-08-23 Janus Weil<janus@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/45366
	* resolve.c (resolve_procedure_interface): New function split off from
	'resolve_symbol'.
	(resolve_formal_arglist): Call it here ...
         (resolve_symbol): ... and here.

2010-08-23 Janus Weil<janus@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/45366
	* gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_29.f90: New.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 45366: Problem with procedure pointer dummy in PURE function
  - From: Janus Weil

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] PR 45366: Problem with procedure pointer dummy in PURE function
  - From: Janus Weil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]