This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Depreciate darwin[0-7]
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:37:13PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:51:43PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> >
> > in darwin9.h. On newer system, remove-outfile, and on older systems, it removes. Kinda simple and straightforward. Anyway, this doesn't work well with SDKs, but having it work without SDK support is better than having it not work. If someone cared more, they could enhance version-compare to work better...
>
> Mike,
> I'm still confused about the potential SDK breakage. Looking at...
>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=09xjqE4nvqAC&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&dq=10.3+libSystem+symlinks&source=bl&ots=e0IbeKedng&sig=iuu7LIX63QxWYuGvSKWTBhA6iIk&hl=en&ei=T5lwTODKLYT78AagsrG8Cw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CCoQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q&f=false
>
> for Panther, I see libSystem described as containing libc, libinfo, libkvm, libpoll, libpthreadm, librpcsvc,
> libdbm and libdl which are provided as symlinks to libSystem (page 217). So only building for the
> 10.2 (darwin6) SDK would be an issue. Putting darwin6 out of its misery would solve that issue and frankly
> building for the 10.2 SDK under 10.3 in the early 21st century is rather a geek trick.
> Jack
Mike,
Wrong URL...
http://books.google.com/books?id=itAU-HCoD7EC&pg=PA141&lpg=PA141&dq=Panther+libSystem&source=bl&ots=BANVJbNcCl&sig=6MdcPGKQRYxFKhlU4s7SShxMpCc&hl=en&ei=yptwTKO-OMOC8gbkivnkCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Panther%20libSystem&f=false
Jack