This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING for LTO ld -r patches

From: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:55:11 +0200
Subject: Re: PING for LTO ld -r patches
References: <20100722082200.GA16834@basil.fritz.box> <AANLkTinD6bBkJZ9SuPRkv04XbajwRqzaOXzZP355ziXx@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:25:11AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > Review ping for:
> >
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/212187
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/212185
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/212186
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/212226
> >
> > The first three patches should be quite straight forward? Ok
> > to commit those after rebootstrap/retest?
> >
> > The fourth is a bit more complicated, but should get reviewed
> > too please.
> 
> This caused:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45042

Thanks for the fix.

-Andi

References:
- PING for LTO ld -r patches
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: PING for LTO ld -r patches
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]