This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 01:26 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> Well. ?Are there any VAR_DECLs whose addresses are not function
>> invariant?
>
> Variable sized ones, particularly those allocated inside loops?
> Although those should have been lowered by this point as well,
> so I'm really not sure.
Hm, indeed. It's a generic predicate in tree.c and so might be used
before that lowering.
I've dealt with the forwprop problem btw, so maybe that already helps.
Richard.
>
>
> r~
>
- References:
- [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, updated] Make emulated TLS lto-friendly.