This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] remove build_constructor_from_list from Java FE
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:14:25 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove build_constructor_from_list from Java FE
- References: <20100705130629.GJ17877@codesourcery.com> <4C31E5A4.2070909@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/05/2010 02:06 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>> The patch below converts all calls to build_constructor_from_list in the
>> Java FE to use build_constructor instead. ?Not much exciting here.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (libjava testsuite). ?OK to commit?
>>
>> -Nathan
>>
>> ? ? ? * constants.c (build_constants_constructor): Use build_constructor
>> ? ? ? instead of build_constructor_from_list.
>> ? ? ? * class.c (make_method_value): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? (get_dispatch_table): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? (make_class_data): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? (emit_indirect_register_classes): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? (emit_symbol_table): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? (add_assertion_table_entry): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? (emit_assertion_table): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? (make_field_value): Use build_constructor_single instead of
>> ? ? ? build_constructor_from_list.
>
> Sure, that all looks reasonable enough.
>
This may have caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44825
--
H.J.