This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 44625

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:10:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 44625
References: <4C31C773.3050000@oracle.com>

On 07/05/2010 07:52 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

I have this patchlet for another case where we use BASELINK_P on
NULL_TREE. Tested x86_64-linux. I propose to apply it to mainline and
4_5-branch only and then close the PR: it's a regression, but just a P5
ice-on-invalid.

Seems like we ought to catch this when we're creating the COMPONENT_REF, rather than when we're trying to substitute into it; we shouldn't create a COMPONENT_REF with a null operand 1.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 44625
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 44625
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]