This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ARM] Fix length attribute for neon_mov<mode> of VSTRUCT
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Jie Zhang <jie at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:52:13 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ARM] Fix length attribute for neon_mov<mode> of VSTRUCT
- References: <4C2AD08A.2040104@codesourcery.com> <1277915471.3358.65.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4C2F6A6C.4060102@codesourcery.com>
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 00:50 +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
> On 07/01/2010 12:31 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 13:05 +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
> >> I just found that the length attribute of neon_mov<mode> pattern for
> >> VSTRUCT is not calculated correctly. This patch should fix it. Testing
> >> on arm-none-eabi for NEON has no regressions. Is it OK to commit?
> >>
> >
> > I *think* this is OK (my one area of concern is whether or not we can
> > still have subreg(mem) at the time that arm_attr_length_move_neon is
> > called).
> >
> > Please wait 24 hours; if nobody says, "yes, you can have such beasts" in
> > that time, then you can check this in.
> >
> Thanks. Now I have committed it on trunk. OK for 4.5 branch, too?
Yes.
R.