This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch ada]: PR/43731 Add multilib for mingw x86/x64
- From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
- To: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:32:04 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch ada]: PR/43731 Add multilib for mingw x86/x64
- References: <AANLkTimxzj-P7ZeCZe56_VG0KKZE83F-J4PpL9LQoTO_@mail.gmail.com> <20100612130721.GA80041@adacore.com> <AANLkTimJI8pKSmPPLNdEVcmz5hpxPD1xv0OxboO8UcPn@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimcfuUERh6xPNS1K7SIWbLG4u_eaOifnhQkjc0U@mail.gmail.com>
> >>> 2010-06-12 ?Kai Tietz
> >>>
> >>> ? ? ? ? PR ada/43731
> >>> ? ? ? ? * gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add rules for multilib x86/x64
> >>> mingw targes.
> >>>
> >>> Ok for apply to trunk?
> >>
> >> OK
> >
> > Applied at revision 160662 to trunk. Ok for merge back to 4.5 branch?
> >
> > Kai
>
> Ping for 4.5 branch merge
Well, I see the following entry in the ChangeLog:
2010-06-12 Kai Tietz
PR ada/43731
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add rules for multilib x86/x64
mingw targets.
This is the only entry with no email address, is this an accepted policy
for commits in GCC? For consistency, it would seem that all ChangeLog entries
should follow the same format.
If so, please put the email address (the one available in the MAINTAINERS
file I guess). OK with this change.
If someone (from e.g. the SC) confirms that such ChangeLog format is OK,
then I have no objection.
Arno