This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Partial inlining

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:16:30 +0200
Subject: Re: Partial inlining
References: <20100622105258.GA15547@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1006221417250.1429@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <20100625083332.GA5209@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <AANLkTim4n01ly7IcR--7Xpt2B1bWktb5aXCX8_1XSLqY@mail.gmail.com>

> > You seem to be consistently on less dumping by default than me. ?I find dumping
> > of reasons why split points are not accepted quite useful, but I guess using
> > -details is not problem.
> >
> 
> This breaks C++:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44671

This does not reproduce for me (at least with "Fix PHI handling in ipa-split" patch my tree)
I am now re-trying from scratch.

Honza
> 
> -- 
> H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Partial inlining
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Partial inlining
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Partial inlining
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Partial inlining
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Partial inlining
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]