This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR target/44588: Very inefficient 8bit mod/div


On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:57 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> If we use AX for quotient in 8bit divmod pattern, we have to make
>>> sure that AX is valid for quotient. ?We have to extend AL with UNSPEC
>>> since AH isn't the part of quotient,. ?Instead, I use AL for quotient and
>>> use UNSPEC_MOVQI_EXTZH to extract remainder from AL. Quotient
>>> access can be optimized very nicely. If remainder is used, we may have
>>> an extract move for UNSPEC_MOVQI_EXTZH. I think this is a reasonable
>>> comprise.
>>
>> Why we need to reinvent movqi_extzv_2 ?
>
> Because UNSPEC_MOVQI_EXTZH extracts AH from AL, not from
> AX, EAX, RAX.

This is wrong, you can't extract AH out from AL...
>
>> I guess that <u>divqi3 has to be implemented as multiple-set divmod
>> pattern using strict_low_part subregs to exactly describe in which
>> subreg quotient and remainder go.
>>
>
> I tried it and couldn't get it to work without adding a new
> constraint for the upper 8bit registers.

"Q" with %h modifier ?

Uros.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]