This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Update^5: Fix PR other/44034
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at spamcop dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, bonzini at gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com, neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:49:30 -0700
- Subject: Re: Update^5: Fix PR other/44034
- References: <20100526035246.h4v4fkajq8kcs0wk-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261121220.6834@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20100526074705.ybxjn3la80cwkgg4-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <20100526114501.naowcook48wo0kwg-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <20100528121743.sj8wuutpdwo8ggkc-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <20100607181903.vsr8r9994w8sk4o0-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <20100608230324.rh3qk1dp9usgswsg-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006171435170.19040@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Is there any reason I shouldn't review this patch, from a doc maintainer
> perspective
Probably not -- but would you provide a URL for the patch so that I can
take a look and just verify that it doesn't seem to conflict with
anything RMS has said?
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713