This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix PR rtl-optimization/42461

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:58:20 -0600
Subject: Re: Fix PR rtl-optimization/42461
References: <201006072302.04043.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <201006131536.00862.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20100613140956.GB6499@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <201006131937.11736.ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> writes:

Eric> In Ada you're allowed to remove them, throwing isn't a side
Eric> effect, it's more of an exceptional condition.  I agree that we
Eric> might want to do that for Java or, rather, that we might have
Eric> wanted to do that if we still really cared about 100% correct Java
Eric> semantics in GCJ at this point.  But do we?

Yes, we do.

Tom

References:
- Fix PR rtl-optimization/42461
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Fix PR rtl-optimization/42461
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Fix PR rtl-optimization/42461
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Fix PR rtl-optimization/42461
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]