Re: [testsuite] 4.4 backport requests, 2nd try

[Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>]

Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:

> The following 4.4 backport requests haven't seen any review, despite a
> reminder:

I'd like to finally reach some closure on those patches.

> 'd like to backport the following patches to the 4.4 branch to
> massively cleanup testsuite results:
>
> 	PATCH: Fix result order in contrib/dg-extract-result.sh
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00125.html
>
> Probably counts as obvious.
>
> 	PATCH: Fix 2 libgomp tests on Solaris 11
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01246.html
>
>         PATCH: Fix 3 g++.old-deja tests on Solaris 11
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01240.html
>
> Those two likewise.

Given that there still hasn't been any review, the patches have lived on
mainline and 4.5 branch for a long time without problems and are
probably obvious on their own, I've installed them on the 4.4 branch now.

>         PATCH: Clear hardware capabilities from gcc.target/i386 executables with Sun ld
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00985.html
>
>         PATCH: Skip some UCN tests unless supported
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00987.html
>
> Those two are bit larger, but massively improve testsuite results.

I won't install these unless someone tells me there's some such rule for
backports.

>         PATCH: Fix broken dg-skip-if in two gcc.target/i386 testcases
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00978.html
>
> Again, probably obvious.

Again, installed under the obvious rule.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University