This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
walk_stmts in comment should be walk_gimple_seq
- From: Jay K <jay dot krell at cornell dot edu>
- To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:04:23 +0000
- Subject: walk_stmts in comment should be walk_gimple_seq
*exceedingly* obvious/trivial and I checked current svn..
jbook2:src jay$ diff -u /src/orig/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/omp-low.c /src/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/omp-low.c
--- /src/orig/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/omp-low.c??? 2010-04-02 12:54:46.000000000 -0700
+++ /src/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/omp-low.c??? 2010-05-27 07:02:37.000000000 -0700
@@ -6102,7 +6102,7 @@
?? gsi_replace (gsi_p, new_stmt, true);
?}
?
-/* Callback for walk_stmts.? Check if the current statement only contains
+/* Callback for walk_gimple_seq.? Check if the current statement only contains
??? GIMPLE_OMP_FOR or GIMPLE_OMP_PARALLEL.? */
?
?static tree