This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [DRAGONEGG] Expose 4 functions in i386.c
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:30:02AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> wrote:
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> >> I see how Jack complained about gcc becoming Linux centric but then
>> >> draggonegg is very x86 centric. Really I think target hooks are the way
>> >> to go and this should not be accepted at this point.
>> >
>> > I completely agree that target hooks are the way to go. ?That's not the
>> > issue here. ?The question is whether it is nonetheless ok to apply this
>> > to the gcc-4.5 branch in order to make things easier for my users, even
>> > though it is technically the wrong thing to do in the long term.
>>
>> No, we don't want this kind of kludges - you can apply them locally.
>>
>> Richard.
>
> Richard,
> ? Can we at least get...
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00545.html
>
> into gcc-4_5-branch so that darwin can build plugins?
> ? ? ? ? ? ?Jack
> ps The trunk version of the same patch is posted at...
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00610.html
Well, surely not before the trunk version is 1) approved and 2) tested
for a while on non-darwin systems.
Richard.
>>
>> > Ciao,
>> >
>> > Duncan.
>> >
>