This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] build: random timestamps have multilib conflicts (PR other/43480)

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:46:44PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
> > for this, but it didn't cover gcc/Makefile.in generated man pages.
> > ls --time-style isn't portable though :(.
> 
> For gcc/, using the contents of gcc/DATESTAMP would seem better.  
> Timestamps on files change as they are checked out, copied, checked into 
> different version control systems, etc.; using the contents of a source 
> file is better.  For Classpath, I don't know if a local change to use 
> gcc/DATESTAMP is appropriate.

Perhaps it could just use first date in ChangeLog file in that case.

	Jakub
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]