This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR34668

From: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Bingfeng Mei <bmei at broadcom dot com>, "gcc-patches\ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:03:20 +0100
Subject: Re: PR34668
References: <7FB04A5C213E9943A72EE127DB74F0AD93E66C4C40@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <84fc9c001003100424t1159c03ei449d72aa350af057@mail.gmail.com> <ydd8wa0l28m.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <84fc9c001003100601q194958ectbfbb5a129ff97837@mail.gmail.com>

Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:

>> Can we than XFAIL the test, please? ?This is really confusing and
>> several people seem to have been looking at this issue, only to discover
>> that it's already known.
>
> Then it will XPASS on the release branch.

True, so remove the XFAIL on the release branch ;-)  Leaving everyone
confused and investigating this doesn't seem like a smart option to me.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR34668
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- PR34668
  - From: Bingfeng Mei
- Re: PR34668
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: PR34668
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: PR34668
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]