This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Unreviewed patches

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:35:00 +0100
Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches
References: <ydd1vg458m0.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <4B8BF868.5010808@gnu.org> <yddsk8k3q3h.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

On 03/01/2010 06:32 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:

I thought configury changes were still required to be approved by a
build maintainer, unless they are completely obvious.

As long as it is "obviously no change on non-Solaris, and the logic is not spread all over the configure.ac file", I am fine with it (instead, a _bad_ example of this are the recent x86 default arch patches). Just give a couple of days for people to look at it, and/or put a [build] tag in the subject.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unreviewed patches
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- Unreviewed patches
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: Unreviewed patches
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Unreviewed patches
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]