This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 02/04/2010 05:16 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
If all of the areas which you suggest be designed differently must be done before the backend can be accepted, then I will see if Xilinx is interested in pursuing this, or if they want to withdraw the patch.
There is a reason why *this* message was titled "suggestions".
That said, the way you're talking sounds like you're planning on getting the port committed to mainline and then not working on it any more? Is this true, or am I mis-interpreting your protestations?
I'm currently talking with Xilinx about future maintenance of the MicroBlaze port.
-- Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |