This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] PR c++/42634

From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:23:15 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFA] PR c++/42634
References: <20100109195300.GA21877@adjoa.torimasen.com> <4B4CBAEB.3030504@redhat.com> <4B4E5F8B.7000602@oracle.com>

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:04:27AM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> The patch is in and now we are seeing many regressions in the v3

Yes, my fault. The second version of the patch breaks because
the change to count_non_default_template_args kind of forces its
callers to call it with innermost template arguments and parameters.
But it looks like dump_template_argument_list can call it with the full
set of arguments/parameters.

I could swear I regtested the second version of the patch before committing,
but now I think I regested the first version of it, twice :(

Sorry about that.

I am regtesting a patch for that at the moment.

        Dodji

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] PR c++/42634
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [RFA] PR c++/42634
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] PR c++/42634
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [RFA] PR c++/42634
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]