This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 42144: [OOP] deferred TBPs do not work

From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:43:37 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 42144: [OOP] deferred TBPs do not work
References: <854832d40912161214y58731768wf5e8b1d9e0c80f31@mail.gmail.com> <339c37f20912161431h5be45986ufc52af6cd8c97c4a@mail.gmail.com> <854832d40912170141s5d71e59epe91295c106653cb3@mail.gmail.com> <4B2A5045.8030507@net-b.de>

Hi Tobias,

> I have now merged the trunk into the fortran-dev branch

thanks a bunch.


> (a) I ignored the trans-expr.c change as it does not apply
> to the vtable.

Yes, that's correct.


> (b) I have included the test case. Thus, you will
> probably get a FAIL when regtesting the branch.

I don't think so. The vtable implementation should be able to handle
deferred TBPs already.

Cheers,
Janus

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] PR 42144: [OOP] deferred TBPs do not work
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 42144: [OOP] deferred TBPs do not work
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 42144: [OOP] deferred TBPs do not work
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 42144: [OOP] deferred TBPs do not work
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]