This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, all targets]: Move definition of "nop" to the top of insn definitions


Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> writes:
> Some parts of gcc (i.e. caller-save [1]) assume that recog_insn
> doesn't return zero for valid insn.

We're hacking all the targets to fix a bad assumption in core code?
That doesn't sound like the best fix to me...


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]