This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] Optimize C++ comdat ctors/dtors in classes without virtual bases (PR c++/3187, take 5)

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:33:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] Optimize C++ comdat ctors/dtors in classes without virtual bases (PR c++/3187, take 5)
References: <20091130223653.GO22813@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> <20091201094652.GQ22813@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> <20091201192247.GT22813@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> <4B157EE4.3010208@gmail.com>

Dave Korn wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
>> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux (with the checking patch on top of
>> it)
> 
>   Is that the Y478 one?

  I assumed it was, but for reasons stated elsewhere it wasn't practical to
run with full checking on so I tested it unchecked; nothing untoward happened.
 JFTR.

    cheers,
      DaveK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Optimize C++ comdat ctors/dtors in classes without virtual bases (PR c++/3187, take 5)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [C++ PATCH] Optimize C++ comdat ctors/dtors in classes without virtual bases (PR c++/3187, take 4)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- [C++ PATCH] Optimize C++ comdat ctors/dtors in classes without virtual bases (PR c++/3187, take 5)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Optimize C++ comdat ctors/dtors in classes without virtual bases (PR c++/3187, take 5)
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]