This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][Ada] Fix tasking on sparc64-linux (122 ACATS FAIL => 1 FAIL)

From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:18:55 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Ada] Fix tasking on sparc64-linux (122 ACATS FAIL => 1 FAIL)
References: <1258533113.30464.71.camel@localhost> <200911200936.48971.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <1258764798.30464.746.camel@localhost> <200911231113.19292.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:13 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Let me know if this is the approach you had in mind.
> 
> I'd have removed the struct_timeval interface from all s-osinte.ads files.

The problem is that I don't have access to the OS in question for
testing the change (and I already broke hpux11
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR42153 )

I can submit a patch without testing though.

Laurent

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][Ada] Fix tasking on sparc64-linux (122 ACATS FAIL => 1 FAIL)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [PATCH][Ada] Fix tasking on sparc64-linux (122 ACATS FAIL => 1 FAIL)
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: [PATCH][Ada] Fix tasking on sparc64-linux (122 ACATS FAIL => 1 FAIL)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH][Ada] Fix tasking on sparc64-linux (122 ACATS FAIL => 1 FAIL)
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: [PATCH][Ada] Fix tasking on sparc64-linux (122 ACATS FAIL => 1 FAIL)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]