This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch committed SH] Fix PR target/41813

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> Just curious, why the naked const_int, why not wrap it in "use"
> or as another operand inside the unspec vector (the latter being
> more canon)?  The naked const_int seems like it could confuse
> something, not that there are many passes after dbr.

Maybe.  I used this naked const_int because currently that insn
works simply as a unique pattern and there are few passes after
dbr.  It should be something you mentioned to avoid the future
problem, though.  I'll replace it with more normal one.  Thanks
for your suggestion.

Regards,
	kaz
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]