This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix GRAPHITE configure

From: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot labs dot mot dot com>
To: Dave Korn<dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: rguenther at suse dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:43:43 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GRAPHITE configure
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0910201404560.4520@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0910201458270.4520@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4ADDEFBA.7060302@gmail.com>
Reply-to: rittle at labs dot mot dot com

In article <4ADDEFBA.7060302@gmail.com>,
Dave Korn<dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com> writes:

> [ Cc added: Loren, who emailed me off-list about the top-level configure tests
> reporting 'yes' even when ppl/cloog aren't going to be configured in. ]

>>> It seems that even though the documentation states that --with-cloog
>>> and --with-ppl need only be specified if cloog/ppl do not reside in
>>> the default search paths graphite is disabled if I do not specify
>>> them (with a correct path even).
[...]
>   Loren, perhaps you'd like to test Richard's patch(*) and see if it does what
> you wanted?

Indeed, this patch is a superset of the fix that I speculated about.

Regards,
Loren

References:
- [PATCH] Fix GRAPHITE configure
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Fix GRAPHITE configure
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Fix GRAPHITE configure
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]