This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Is gcj dead?
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- To: yuri at rawbw dot com
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:48:01 +0100
- Subject: Re: Is gcj dead?
- References: <4AD846B0.2080102@rawbw.com>
Yuri wrote:
> Last news in http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ are dated March 2007.
> Also I submitted few PRs a month ago and there is no response at all.
>
> Yuri
Yuri makes a good point. Here's an update.
htdocs/java/ChangeLog:
* index.html: Mention recent windows updates.
Ok?
cheers,
DaveK
(Yuri, you might get a bit more attention if you post to the java@ list rather
than the main one. GCJ is by no means dead, but it's understaffed as
open-source projects often are, so sometimes it can be a while before anyone
is free to respond.)
Index: htdocs/java/index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.173
diff -p -u -r1.173 index.html
--- htdocs/java/index.html 30 Mar 2007 20:56:50 -0000 1.173
+++ htdocs/java/index.html 16 Oct 2009 11:26:24 -0000
@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ href="http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/";>
<!-- News entries start here -->
<dl class="news">
+<dt>September 22, 2009</dt>
+<dd>GCJ support on Windows (Cygwin and MinGW) targets has been enhanced
+with a number of bugfixes, and the option to build libgcj in DLL form
+for dynamic runtime linking.</dd>
+
<dt>March 30, 2007</dt>
<dd>Keith Seitz and Kyle Galloway have made considerable progress on
GCJ's implementation of the JDWP. It is now possible to use eclipse