Re: [split] Add CFI ops, fix call/return prediction, other changes

[Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>]

Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> writes:

> Yes, understood.  But for stdcall functions to work you need a
> stack-popping ret here too (you are returning to the caller and need
> to clean up your arguments).  This would consume more than one byte.

Ah, I see what you mean.  Still, I'd hate to waste two bytes per
function for something weird like stdcall.  I'll see if I can think of
a better approach when I try to tackle stdcall.

Ian